Clinical
features
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
|  |  | | Therapy |
Atrial flutter
- Ibutilide
a

Why?
-
Ibutilide is more effective at cardioversion than procainamide,
a
sotalol,
a
or placebo
a
-
However, it increases the risk of ventricular tachycardias,
a
but still causes fewer overall adverse effects than procainamide
a
Ibutilide is effective at cardioversion, but cause ventricular tachycardia
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
recent-onset AF or flutter
a
|
ibutilide
|
placebo
|
sinus rhythm
at
1.5
hours
|
2.5%
|
1800%
(380% to
7400%)
|
2
(2 to
3)
|
|
|
|
|
polymorphic VT
at
24
hours
|
0.0%
|
|
-11
(-21 to
-7)
|
recent-onset AF or flutter
a
|
ibutilide
|
procainamide
|
sinus rhythm
at
24
hours
|
18%
|
220%
(79% to
470%)
|
3
(2 to
4)
|
|
|
|
|
adverse effects
|
47%
|
39%
(1% to
63%)
|
5
(3 to
76)
|
recent-onset AF or flutter
a
|
ibutilide
|
sotalol
|
sinus rhythm
at
60
minutes
|
11%
|
65%
(33% to
82%)
|
5
(3 to
9)
|
|