Browse Guides  internal medicine  neurology

Stroke

Prevalence
Clinical features
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
Therapy

Dysphagia

Consider inserting percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PEG) for patients with persistent dysphagia a unless they have c

  • GI abnormalities 
  • ascites or hepatomegaly 
  • clotting disorders 
Why?
  • Patients who receive PEG feeding compared with nasogastric tube feeding are less likely to die a , and are more likely to put on weight. a
  • PEG feeding is less likely to fail than nasogastric tube feeding. There is no clear difference in the complication rate. a

Dysphagia: fewer patients die or fail treatment on PEG feeding than nasogastric tube feeding

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER OR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
stroke and dysphagia a percutaneous gastrostomy tube feeding nasogastric tube feeding death
at 6-12 weeks
61% 0.28
(0.09 to 0.89)
3
(2 to )
      treatment failures
at 6-12 weeks
26% 0.10
(0.02 to 0.52)
4
(4 to 9)

 

Dysphagia: more patientsgain weight on PEG feeding than nasogastric tube feeding

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER RRR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
stroke and persistent dysphagia for ≥ 8 days a percutaneous gastrostomy tube feeding nasogastric tube feeding weight gain
at 7 days
13% -64%
(-97% to -32%)
2
(1 to 3)

Expiry date: October 2003
Levels of Evidence used in grading these guides

Author   CM   Ball
Reviewer   G  Donnan
CAT Writers   CJ   Wotton , N   Shenker , CM   Ball