Prevalence
Clinical
features
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
|  |  | | Therapy |
Dysphagia
Consider inserting percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PEG) for patients with persistent dysphagia
a
unless they have c
-
GI abnormalities
-
ascites or hepatomegaly
-
clotting disorders
Why?
-
Patients who receive PEG feeding compared with nasogastric tube feeding are less likely to
die a
, and are more likely to put on weight.
a
-
PEG feeding is less likely to fail than nasogastric tube feeding. There is no clear difference in the complication rate.
a
Dysphagia: fewer patients die or fail treatment on PEG feeding than nasogastric tube feeding
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
OR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
stroke and dysphagia a
|
percutaneous gastrostomy tube feeding
|
nasogastric tube feeding
|
death
at 6-12 weeks
|
61%
|
0.28
(0.09 to 0.89)
|
3
(2 to )
|
|
|
|
|
treatment failures
at 6-12 weeks
|
26%
|
0.10
(0.02 to 0.52)
|
4
(4 to 9)
|
Dysphagia: more patientsgain weight on PEG feeding than nasogastric tube feeding
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
stroke and persistent dysphagia for ≥ 8 days
a
|
percutaneous gastrostomy tube feeding
|
nasogastric tube feeding
|
weight gain
at
7
days
|
13%
|
-64%
(-97% to
-32%)
|
2
(1 to
3)
|
|