Prevalence
Clinical
features
Differential
diagnosis
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
|  |  | | Therapy |
Angioplasty
Give abciximab a
b
Why?
-
Abciximab reduces myocardial infarction and the need for urgent
revascularisation compared with placebo, but increases the risk of
major bleeding. b
-
Abciximab reduces death, myocardial infarction and the need for urgent
revascularisation compared with tirofiban, but causes more
thrombocytopenia. a
There is no clear difference in major bleeding between the two drugs. d
-
Eptifibatide reduces death, myocardial infarction and the need for urgent revascularisation
compared with placebo. a
The effect on major bleeding is unclear. b
Abciximab reduces myocardial infarction and
urgent revascularisation but increases major bleeding
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
OR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
angioplasty b
|
abciximab
|
placebo
|
myocardial infartion
at 30 days
|
8.5%
|
0.49
(0.40 to 0.59)
|
24
(20 to 30)
|
|
|
|
|
urgent revascularisation
at 30 days
|
6.9%
|
0.42
(0.34 to 0.53)
|
29
(25 to 36)
|
|
|
|
|
major bleeding
at 30 days
|
3.8%
|
1.53
(1.24 to 1.90)
|
-53
(-120 to -31)
|
|
|
eptifibatide or tirofiban
|
placebo
|
urgent revasculariation
at 30 days
|
5.5%
|
0.76
(0.60 to 0.96)
|
79
(47 to 480)
|
Abciximab reduces death, MI and urgent revascularisation but increases
thrombocytopenia compared with tirofiban
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
angioplasty b
|
tirofiban
|
abciximab
|
death, non-fatal MI, urgent revascularisation
at 30 days
|
6.0%
|
-1.58%
(-3.00% to -0.153%)
|
-63
(-650 to -33)
|
|
|
|
|
thrombocytopenia
at 30 days
|
2.4%
|
1.91%
(1.23% to 2.58%)
|
52
(39 to 81)
|
Eptifibatide reduces death, MI and urgent revascularisation
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
elective angioplasty with stenting a
|
eptifibatide
|
placebo
|
death, non-fatal MI, urgent revascularisation
at 30 days
|
22%
|
21%
(6% to 33%)
|
22
(12 to 88)
|
|