Prevalence
Clinical
features
Differential
diagnosis
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
|  |  | | Therapy |
Start a beta-blocker
a
or a calcium channel blocker (e.g. dilitazem
a
or verapamil).
a
Why?
-
Metoprolol reduces recurrent
ischaemia
, without clearly reducing myocardial infarction.
a
-
Diltiazem reduces chest pain (roughly one fewer episode every 2 days)
c
and is more effective than nitroglycerin .
a
Fewer patients have serious headaches, but more develop AV conduction abnormalities.
a
-
Verapamil or dilitazem reduces myocardial infarction, but there is no clear effect on mortality.
a
Metoprolol reduces recurrent
ischaemia
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
unstable angina
a
|
metoprolol
|
placebo
|
recurrent
ischaemia
at 48 hours
|
21%
|
53%
(-3% to
78%)
|
9
(4 to 380)
|
Diltiazem reduces myocardial infarction and
refractory angina better than nitroglycerin
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
unstable angina
a
|
iv dilitazem
|
iv nitroglycerin
|
MI or refractory angina
at
2
days
|
41%
|
51%
(12% to
73%)
|
5
(3 to
20)
|
|
|
|
|
refractory angina
at
2
days
|
30%
|
55%
(4% to
79%)
|
6
(3 to
54)
|
|
|
|
|
serious headache requiring analgesia
at
2
days
|
25%
|
80%
(33% to
94%)
|
5
(3 to
13)
|
|
|
|
|
AV conduction abnormalities
at
2
days
|
0%
|
|
-12
(-75 to
-7)
|
Verapamil or diltiazem reduces myocardial
infarction
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
RRR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
unstable angina or MI a
|
verapamil or diltiazem
|
placebo
|
myocardial infarction
at
6
weeks
|
7.5%
|
0.79%
(0.67% to
0.94%)
|
68
(43 to
240)
|
Cardiovascular disease: verapamil reduces
non-fatal myocardial infarction
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
NNT
(95% CI) |
MI, angina or hypertension
a
|
verapamil
|
placebo
|
non-fatal myocardial infarction
at
months
|
7.4%
|
64
(38 to 450)
|
Note:
-
Beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates are not clearly
different in reducing myocardial infarction or death from heart
disease
d
but more patients stop beta-blockers than calcium-channel blockers due
to side-effects.
a
-
There is no clear benefit from starting beta-blockers and
calcium-channel blockers together compared with beta-blockers alone
a
-
Calcium-channel blockers do not clearly increase the risk of cancer
a
b
-
There is no clear benefit in giving dihydropyridine calcium blockers (nifedipine
and nicardipine) to patients with unstable angina or MI - they may
well be harmful
a
. Specifically short-acting nifedipine increases mortality.
b
Short-acting nifedipine increases mortality
| Patient |
Treatment |
Comparison |
Outcome |
CER |
OR (95% CI) |
NNT
(95% CI) |
myocardial infarction or angina
b
|
short-acting nifedipine
|
placebo
|
death
at
months
|
6.6%
|
1.16 (1.01 to
1.33) |
100
(51 to
1600)
|
- Patients with mild-moderate asthma who take cardioselective
beta-blockers have a small initial fall in FEV1 (on average 8%), but
are not more likely to report respiratory symptoms. a

|