Browse Guides  internal medicine  cardiology

Acute coronary syndrome

Prevalence
Clinical features
Differential diagnosis
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
Therapy

Start a beta-blocker a or a calcium channel blocker (e.g. dilitazem a or verapamil). a  

Why?

  • Metoprolol reduces recurrent ischaemia , without clearly reducing myocardial infarction. a
  • Diltiazem reduces chest pain (roughly one fewer episode every 2 days) c and is more effective than nitroglycerin . a Fewer patients have serious headaches, but more develop AV conduction abnormalities. a
  • Verapamil or dilitazem reduces myocardial infarction, but there is no clear effect on mortality. a

Metoprolol reduces recurrent ischaemia

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER RRR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
unstable angina a metoprolol placebo recurrent ischaemia
at 48 hours
21% 53%
(-3% to 78%)
9 (4 to 380)

Diltiazem reduces myocardial infarction and refractory angina better than nitroglycerin

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER RRR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
unstable angina a iv dilitazem iv nitroglycerin MI or refractory angina
at 2 days
41% 51%
(12% to 73%)
5
(3 to 20)
      refractory angina
at 2 days
30% 55%
(4% to 79%)
6
(3 to 54)
      serious headache requiring analgesia
at 2 days
25% 80%
(33% to 94%)
5
(3 to 13)
      AV conduction abnormalities
at 2 days
0%
-12
(-75 to -7)

Verapamil or diltiazem reduces myocardial infarction

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER RRR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
unstable angina or MI a verapamil or diltiazem placebo myocardial infarction
at 6 weeks
7.5% 0.79%
(0.67% to 0.94%)
68
(43 to 240)

Cardiovascular disease: verapamil reduces non-fatal myocardial infarction

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER NNT
(95% CI)
MI, angina or hypertension a verapamil placebo non-fatal myocardial infarction
at months
7.4% 64
(38 to 450)
 

Note:

  • Beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates are not clearly different in reducing myocardial infarction or death from heart disease d but more patients stop beta-blockers than calcium-channel blockers due to side-effects. a
  • There is no clear benefit from starting beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers together compared with beta-blockers alone a
  • Calcium-channel blockers do not clearly increase the risk of cancer a b
  • There is no clear benefit in giving dihydropyridine calcium blockers (nifedipine and nicardipine) to patients with unstable angina or MI - they may well be harmful a . Specifically short-acting nifedipine increases mortality. b

Short-acting nifedipine increases mortality

Patient Treatment Comparison Outcome CER OR
(95% CI)
NNT
(95% CI)
myocardial infarction or angina b short-acting nifedipine placebo death
at months
6.6% 1.16
(1.01 to 1.33)
100
(51 to 1600)
  • Patients with mild-moderate asthma who take cardioselective beta-blockers have a small initial fall in FEV1 (on average 8%), but are not more likely to report respiratory symptoms. a

 

Expiry date: June 2003
Levels of Evidence used in grading these guides

Authors   CM   Ball , N   Shenker
Reviewer   I K   Jang
CAT Writers   N   Shenker , CJ   Wotton , CM   Ball , RS   Phillips