Browse Guides  internal medicine  cardiology

Deep vein thrombosis

Prevalence
Clinical features
Differential diagnosis
Investigations
Therapy
Prevention
Prognosis
Clinical features

Use the following clinical prediction rule to rank patients for their risk of having a DVT. a
For patients with symptoms in both legs, use the most symptomatic leg.

Clinical prediction rule to rank DVT risk

Ask about   Score
Active cancer (on-going treatment, diagnosed within the last 6 months or having palliative care) +1
Paralysis, paresis, or plaster immobilisation of a leg +1
Recently bedridden >3 days or major surgery within past 4 weeks +1

 

Look for   Score
Localised tenderness over distribution of the deep veins a +1
Entire leg swollen +1
Calf circumference 10 cm below tibial tuberosity >3cm greater than other calf +1
Pitting oedema only in the symptomatic leg a +1
Collateral dilated (but not varicose) veins +1
An alternative diagnosis as or more likely than DVT -2


Match the patient's score to their risk.

Score a Risk of DVT
3 or more High
1 to 2 Moderate
0 or less Low
 

Remember DVT cannot be safely diagnosed or excluded on history and physical examination alone. Imaging studies are necessary.  a  

Why?

When combined with ultrasonography (see below):

  • Few cases of DVT are missed (0.6%). a If all suspected cases have ultrasound scanning only, then 5% of DVT are missed. a If all suspected cases have venography only, then 2% of DVT are missed. c
  • Few patients require a venogram (5.6%) However one in three will have an extra hospital visit for additional testing. a
  • It helps clinicians agree about the risk of DVT. K interobserver for prediction rule = 0.75 (2 nurses and 2 doctors) a

A clinical prediction rule can help rank a patient for risk of deep vein thrombosis

Patient Target Disorder and
Reference Standard
Diagnostic Test LR+
(95% CI)
Post-test Probability
suspected deep vein thrombosis a
(pre-test probability: 16%)
deep vein thrombosis
(ultrasound, venogram, follow-up)
score: 3 or more 15
(9.5 to 25)
75%
    score: 1 to 2 1.0
(0.76 to 1.4)
17%
    score: 0 or less 0.16
(0.091 to 0.30)
3%

 

Expiry date: January 2004
Levels of Evidence used in grading these guides

Author   C   Ball
Reviewer   J   Ginsberg
CAT Writers   C   Ball , B   Phillips