Anticoagulation: primary-care based management was as safe and
effective as hospital-based management.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
- Patients on anticoagulation who were treated in primary
care using near-patient testing and computer
decision-support compared with hospital care were not
clearly less likely to die or have a serious adverse event
- Patients in both groups spent a similar percentage of
time with an INR within the therapeutic range.
| |
Fitzmaurice et al: Archives of Internal Medicine 2000; 160 :
2343-2348
|
Expires October 2003 |
The study Double-blinded ?concealed randomised trial with
intention-to-treat Setting: 12 general practices, Birmingham, UK - 3
used as controls
376 patients (aged , 55% male) requiring
anticoagulation (48% for atrial fibrillation)
Excluded if
Control Group: (n = 245, 245 analysed): usual
hospital-based care Experimental Group: (n = 122, 122 analysed):
practice-based care by nurses using near-patient testing and computerised
decision support systems. Nurses checked with primary-care physicians if a
dose change or a break in treatment was suggested. Patients started on
warfarin were stablised in a hospital clinic before randomisation.
100% followed for 12 months Outcome notes:
- serious adverse event : stroke, epistaxis, venous thromboembolic
event
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER |
EER |
RRR (95% CI) |
ARR (95% CI) |
NNT (95% CI) |
| death |
12 months |
6 (2.45%) |
3 (2.46%) |
0% (-300% to 74%) |
-0.01% (-3.37% to 3.35%) |
-9900 (NNT = 30 to infinity; NNH = 30 to infinity) |
| serious adverse event |
12 months |
10 (4.08%) |
3 (2.46%) |
40% (-120% to 83%) |
1.62% (-2.08% to 5.32%) |
62 (NNT = 19 to infinity; NNH = 48 to infinity)
|
- Primary-care based patients spent 69% (95% CI: 66% to 73%) of the time
within the set therapeutic range. Hospital based patients spent 62% (95%
CI: 54% to 70%) of the time within the set range.
Comments
- The study was too small to show any difference between the two
groups for mortality or adverse events.
Citation
- Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Murray ET, et al: oral anticoagulation
management in primary care with the use of computerized decision support
and near-patient testing: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of
Internal Medicine 2000; 160 : 2343-2348
Search Terms: from EBM
journal Contributor: Chris Ball, October 2001 Reviewer: Clare
Wotton
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
anticoagulation |
| Intervention or Exposure |
primary-care management |
| Comparison |
hospital management |
| Outcome |
death, therapeutic INR | |
|