Community-acquired pneumonia: no clear role for sputum Gram's stain
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 2a-)
-
The role of sputum Gram's stain in the identifying the causative organism in community-acquired pneumonia is unclear.
|
|
Reed et al:
Western Journal of Medicine
1996;
165:
197-204
|
Expires
March 2003
|
The study
Systematic review of all diagnostic studies
of
Patients: community-acquired pneumonia
Intervention: sputum Gram's stain
Outcome: detection of pneumococcus
Articles found in English
using Medline, 1966 to 1993
(search terms: sputum, Gram's stain and pneumonia
)
and searching bibliographies of retrieved articles
Selection criteria: see above
Appraisal criteria: 3 blinded reviewers looked for an independent reference standard, evidence of community-acquired pneumonia, and enough information to calculate 2x2 tables. Authors were contacted to obtained more information about blinding and other protocol issues.
Articles excluded if:
11 prospective studies and 1 retrospective chart review found involving 1322 patients.
The evidence
- Sensitivity ranged from 15% to 100% and specificity from 11% to 100%. Most studies had a sensitivity < 70%
Comments
- 70% of patients were able to produce a purulent sputum sample. Such practical considerations further limit the clinical utility of the test.
- Limiting the search to Medline and the English language mean important studies may have been missed.
- Study size, blinding, the definition of a positive test or control for antibiotic use was not statistically related to test characteristics.
Citation
-
Reed
WW,
Byrd
GS,
Gates
RJ, et al:
Sputum Gram's stain in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia: a meta-analysis.
Western Journal of Medicine
1996;
165:
197-204
Search Terms:
(sputum near culture) and pneumon* in Cochrane
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
November 1999
Reviewer: Mitsuhiro Kamei
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
|
| Intervention or Exposure |
|
| Outcome |
|
|
|