Anaphylaxis: bee stings may be removed quickly by scraping or pinching
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 5)
-
Removing bee stings by pinching rather than scraping did not clearly increase the size of the wheal.
-
The longer the bee sting remained in place, the greater the size of the subsequent wheal. Stings should be removed quickly - by whatever method.
|
|
Visscher et al:
Lancet
1996;
348:
301-302
|
Expires
November 2004
|
The study
Single-blinded ?concealed quasi-randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: entomology department, USA
2 patients
who underwent voluntary bee stings (10 per treatment)
Control Group: (n = 20, 20 analysed):
sting removal by scraping
Experimental Group: (n = 20, 20 analysed):
sting removal by pinching
100% followed for
10
minutes
The evidence
| Outcome |
Control Group (SD) |
Experimental Group (SD) |
Mean Difference (95% CI) |
| wheal size (mm
2
)
|
80
(26)
|
74
(23)
|
6
(-10 to 22)
|
- Wheal size increased the longer the sting was left in place (p=0.018).
Comments
- Stings were removed from one arm by scraping and from the other by pinching.
Citation
-
Visscher
PK,
Vetter
RS,
Camazine
S:
removing bee stings.
Lancet
1996;
348:
301-302
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
November 1999
Reviewer: Santiago Alvarez Montero
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
bee sting |
| Intervention or Exposure |
scraping |
| Comparison |
pinching |
| Outcome |
wheal size |
|
|