Atrial fibrillation: acute: verapamil and quinidine achieved cardioversion faster than digoxin and quinidine.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation and a fast ventricular rate who received verapamil and quinidine compared with digoxin and quinidine were more likely to revert to sinus rhythm early
(NNT =
3
at 6
hours)
, but this difference was not clear at 24 hours.
-
Patients given verapamil-quinidine were more likely to be discharged home
(NNT =
3
at 6
hours)
.
-
There was no clear difference in the number of adverse events.
|
|
Innes et al:
Annals of Emergency Medicine
1997;
29 (1):
126-134
|
Expires
August 2003
|
The study
Double-blinded concealed randomised
trial
without
intention-to-treat
Setting: emergency department, acute hospital, Canada.
44 patients
(aged
mean 60 years,
61%
male)
with atrial fibrillation of <48 hours and a ventricular rate >100 beats/ min
Excluded if
conduction abnormalities including second or third degree heart block, sick sinus syndrome, or QRS > 120 ms
hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) with evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion (confusion, comas, severe angina or acute MI)
allergy to digoxin, quinidine or verapamil
ventricular rate >200 beats/ min
aged <18 or >75
Control Group: (n = 25, 22 analysed):
digoxin 500
µ
g iv followed by two doses of 250
µ
g if required. When the ventricular rate fell below 100 beats/ min, patients received quinidine 200 mg every two hours until cardioversion, adverse effects causing withdrawal or a total of 1 g was given
Experimental Group: (n = 19, 19 analysed):
verapamil 5 mg repeated up to a maximum of 20 mg in total. When the ventricular rate fell below 100 beats/ min, patients received quinidine 200 mg every two hours until cardioversion, adverse effects causing withdrawal or a total of 1 g was given.
93% followed for
24
hours
Outcome notes:
-
no cardioversion to sinus rhythm
: at 6 hours
-
no cardioversion to sinus rhythm
: at 24 hours
-
continued hospitalisation
: if cardioversion occurred within 6 hours
-
adverse events
: nausea, vomiting, bradycardia
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| no cardioversion to sinus rhythm
|
6
hours |
12 (54.6%) |
3 (15.8%) |
71% (12% to
90%) |
38.8% (12.3% to
65.3%) |
3
(2 to
8)
|
| no cardioversion to sinus rhythm
|
24
hours |
6 (27.3%) |
2 (10.5%) |
61% (-69% to
91%) |
16.8% (-6.42% to
39.9%) |
6
(NNT = 3 to infinity;
NNH =
16
to infinity)
|
| continued hospitalisation
|
6
hours |
16 (72.7%) |
7 (36.8%) |
49% (4% to
73%) |
35.9% (7.31% to
64.5%) |
3
(2 to
14)
|
| adverse events
|
24
hours |
2 (9.09%) |
3 (15.8%) |
-74% (-833% to
68%) |
-6.70% (-27.0% to
13.6%) |
-15
(NNT = 7 to infinity;
NNH =
4
to infinity)
|
Comments
- There was no clear difference in the speed of control of ventricular rate.
Citation
-
Innes
GD,
Vertesi
L,
Dillon
EC, et al:
effectiveness of verapamil-quinidine versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Annals of Emergency Medicine
1997;
29 (1):
126-134
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
August 1999
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
acute atrial fibrillation and a fast ventricular rate-onset |
| Intervention or Exposure |
verapamil and quinidine |
| Comparison |
digoxin and quinidine |
| Outcome |
conversion to sinus rhythm |
|
|