Anticoagulation: a 5 mg loading dose was more successful than 10 mg
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients starting anticoagulation who received a loading dose of 5 mg compared with 10 mg were more likely to have their INR 2.0-3.0 for 2 consecutive days and never above 3.0
(NNT =
2
at 5
days)
.
-
There was no clear effect on the number of patients who have a supratherapeutic INR.
|
|
Crowther et al:
Archives of Internal Medicine
1999;
159:
46-48
|
Expires
October 2003
|
The study
Unblinded ?concealed randomised
trial
without
intention-to-treat
Setting: thromboembolism unit, university hospital, Canada
53 patients
(aged
mean 66,
53%
female)
starting anticoagulation with warfarin
Excluded if
contraindication to warfarin
geographically inaccessible
Control Group: (n = 21, 21 analysed):
loading dose of 10 mg
warfarin
Experimental Group: (n = 32, 31 analysed):
loading dose of 5 mg
warfarin
98% followed for
5
days
Warfarin was subsequently given using a dosing protocol based on daily INR measurements.
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| INR 2.0 to 3.0 on 2 consecutive days, and never > 3.0
|
5
days |
5 (23.8%) |
21 (65.63%) |
55% (23% to
74%) |
43.82% (17.27% to
66.36%) |
2
(2 to
6)
|
| INR > 3.0
|
5
days |
5 (23.8%) |
2 (6.25%) |
74% (-23% to
94%) |
17.56% (-2.50% to
37.61%) |
6
(NNT = 3 to infinity;
NNH =
40
to infinity)
|
Comments
- The study is too small to show any difference between the 2 regimens for over anticoagulation.
Citation
-
Crowther
MA,
Ginsberg
JB,
Kearon
C, et al:
A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses.
Archives of Internal Medicine
1999;
159:
46-48
Search Terms:
?
Contributor: Chris Ball and Musab Hayatli,
October 1999
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
starting anticoagulation |
| Intervention or Exposure |
warfarin 5 mg loading dose |
| Comparison |
warfarin 10 mg loading dose |
| Outcome |
successful anticoagulation |
|
|