Venous thromboembolism: idiopathic: indefinite anticoagulation reduced recurrent episodes.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients with a first episode of idiopathic thromboembolism who received indefinite anticoagulation compared with anticoagulation for 3 months, were less likely to have a recurrent venous thromboembolism
(NNT =
5
at 10
months)
.
-
There was no clear difference in mortality, major bleeding or patients stopping their medication.
|
|
Kearon et al:
New England Journal of Medicine
1999;
340 (12):
901-907
|
Expires
October 2003
|
The study
Double-blinded concealed randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: 14 acute hospitals, USA and Canada
162 patients
(aged
mean 59,
60%
male)
with a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism (objectively diagnosed) who received oral anticoagulation for three months following an initial course of heparin or LMWH.
Excluded if
initially treated with non-licenced LMWH
fracture or plaster cast of lower limb within previous 3 months
hospitalisation with confinement to bed for 3 consecutive days or use of general anaesthesia within previous 3 months
known deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S
cancer in previous 5 years
contraindication to long-term anticoagulation
required long-term therapy with NSAIDs, ticlopidine, sulfinpyrazone, dipyridamole or more than 160 mg asprin per day
familial bleeding diathesis
major psychiatric disorder
pregnant or could become pregnant
life-expectancy < than 2 years
considered non-compliant
geographic inaccessibility precluded follow-up
Note: Patients were stratified for DVT or pulmonary embolism, and centre before randomisation.
Control Group: (n = 83, 83 analysed):
placebo
Experimental Group: (n = 79, 79 analysed):
warfarin
indefinitely adjusted so INR 2.0 to 3.0
100% followed for
10
months
Outcome notes:
-
recurrent venous thromboembolism
: DVT by compression ultrasound or venography; PE by ventilation-perfusion scanning followed by compression ultrasound, bilateral venography or pulmonary angiography if non-diagnostic
-
major bleeding
: clinically overt and associated with a fall in Hb of at least 20 g/l, a need for transfusion of 2 or more units, retroperitoneal or intracranial, or required permanent discontinuation of the study drug
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| recurrent venous thromboembolism
|
10
months |
17 (20.5%) |
1 (1.27%) |
94% (55% to
99%) |
19.2% (10.2% to
28.2%) |
5
(4 to
10)
|
| death
|
10
months |
3 (3.61%) |
1 (1.27%) |
65% (-230% to
96%) |
2.35% (-2.36% to
7.06%) |
43
(NNT = 14 to infinity;
NNH =
42
to infinity)
|
| major bleeding
|
10
months |
0 (0.0%) |
3 (3.80%) |
% (% to
%) |
-3.80% (-8.01% to
0.42%) |
-26
(NNT = 240 to infinity;
NNH =
12
to infinity)
|
| discontinued medication
|
10
months |
13 (15.7%) |
14 (17.7%) |
-13% (-125% to
43%) |
-2.06% (-13.6% to
9.43%) |
-49
(NNT = 11 to infinity;
NNH =
7
to infinity)
|
Recurrent episodes included 11 DVT, 5 non-fatal PE and 1 fatal PE.
Comments
- Ongoing studies are in progress to determine if two years of anticoagulant therapy is sufficient, or if a lower intensity of anticoagulation (i.e., target International Normalized Ratio [INR]: 1.5 to 1.9) is effective after an initial 3 to 6 month period of higher-intensity anticoagulation (i.e., INR: 2.0 to 3.0).
Citation
-
Kearon
C,
Gent
M,
Hirsch
J, et al:
a comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
New England Journal of Medicine
1999;
340 (12):
901-907
Search Terms:
?
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
October 1999
Reviewer: James Douketis
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
idiopathic venous thromboembolism |
| Intervention or Exposure |
indefinite anticoagulation |
| Comparison |
anticoagulation for 3 months |
| Outcome |
recurrent venous thromboembolism, death, major bleeding |
|
|