Tachycardia: Implantable Atrioverters converted rhythm safely.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 2c)
-
Patients with atrial fibrillation who were given an implantable Atrioverter, were likely to have conversion to sinus rhythm with few complications.
-
Patients were likely to experience early recurrence of atrial fibrillation following shock.
|
|
Wellens et al:
Circulation
1998;
98:
1651-1656
|
Expires
October 2003
|
The study
Outcome study
with
objective
outcomes,
?adjusted
for confounding factors,
not
validated in an independent set of patients.
Setting: 19 centres in 9 countries (The Netherlands, China, Germany, USA, UK, Belgium, France, Sweden, Canada)
51 patients
(aged
range 31 to 77 years; mean 58,
78%
male)
prior episodes of atrial fibrillation that had spontaneously converted to normal sinus rhythm with intervals of recurrence of atrial fibrillation episodes between 1 week and 3 months
Excluded if
implanted heart valve
atrial fibrillation of reversible cause (eg. after cardiac surgery, hyperthyroidism)
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
myocardial infarction or myocardial revascularisation
=
year
active angina or cardiac ischaemia
history of left atrial thromboembolic events
congestive heart failure (NYHA class >II)
left ventricular ejection fraction <40%
ECG documentation of sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (>3 consecutive beats)
defibrillation level >240 V at inclusion testing procedure
Implantable atrial defibrillator (Atrioverter)-starting with 180 V shock, shock intensity was increased in 20 V steps until successful defibrillation was achieved. After this success, fibrillation was reinduced and a shock 20 V less than the successful shock was given. The intensity was decreased in 20 V steps until there was a failure to convert. Shocks were then delivered at 20 V steps of increasing intensity until atrial fibrillation was successfully converted with the delivery of 2 shocks at this intensity.
followed for
3 months
Outcomes studied:
termination of atrial fibrillation
early recurrence of atrial fibrillation
resumption within 1 minute after shock that resulted in sinus rhythm for
=
1 beat
serious complications
subclavian venous thrombosis, pericardial effusion, infection requiring explantation of the device and leads
The evidence
| outcome |
time to outcome |
number of patients/total number |
%
(95% CI) |
| termination of atrial fibrillation
|
3 months
|
41/51 |
80.4%
(69.5% to
91.3%) |
| early recurrence of atrial fibrillation
|
3 months
|
21/51 |
41.2%
(27.7% to
54.7%) |
| serious complications
|
3 months
|
5/51 |
9.80%
(1.60% to
18.0%) |
Comments
- No information is given about the complications with or without anticoagulation. Benefits and harms due to anticoagulation would need a much larger series of patients.
Citation
-
Wellens
HJJ,
Lau
C-P,
Luederitz
B, et al:
Atrioverter: An implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Circulation
1998;
98:
1651-1656
Contributor: Clare Wotton and Musab Hayatli,
October 1999
Reviewer: Bruce Arroll
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
atrial fibrillation |
| Intervention or Exposure |
implantable defibrillator (Atrioverter) |
| Comparison |
|
| Outcome |
restoration of sinus rhythm |
|
|