Cardiac arrest: bretylium tosylate had no clear effect.
|
|
The study
Double-blinded ?concealed quasi-randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: 1 general hospital, USA
57 patients
(aged
mean 57 years,
71%
male)
cardiopulmonary arrest
Excluded if
- cardiac monitor was not operative during part of resuscitation
- patient not seen by an investigator
- protocol dosage for the study solution was not followed (post-randomisation exclusion)
Control Group: (n = 28, 28 analysed):
0.2 ml/kg saline
Experimental Group: (n = 29, 29 analysed):
intravenous bretylium tosylate-0.2 ml/kg of 10 mg/kg by rapid bolus injection
The first 4 patients in the study received 0.1 ml/kg of 5 mg/kg bretylium. A second dose of the study solution was given if there was no response after 20 minutes.
100% followed for
?
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| survival to discharge
|
unknown |
3 (10.7%) |
8 (27.6%) |
19% (-5% to
37%) |
16.87% (-3.02% to
36.77%) |
6
(NNT = 3 to infinity;
NNH =
33
to infinity)
|
Comments
- The trial is too small to show any clear difference in survival to discharge between the two groups.
- Treatment followed American Heart Association guidelines.
- Lidocaine was used more frequently in the bretylium group and isoproterenol was used more often in the saline group.
- 11 adverse reactions occurred in the bretylium group (tachycardia, 5; hypotension, 4; bradycardia, 1; hypertension, 1) compared with 1 in the saline group (hypotension).
Citation
-
Nowak
RM,
Bodnar
TJ,
Dronen
S, et al:
Bretylium tosylate as initial treatment for cardiopulmonary arrest: Randomized comparison with placebo.
Annals of Emergency Medicine
1981;
10 (8):
404-407
Contributor: Clare Wotton and Musab Hayatli,
October 1999
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
cardiopulmonary arrest |
| Intervention or Exposure |
bretylium tosylate |
| Comparison |
saline |
| Outcome |
survival |
|
|