Aortic dissection: prognosis was poor.
|
|
The study
Case series
with
?objective ?blinded
outcomes,
not adjusted
for confounding factors,
not
validated in an independent set of patients.
Setting: 11 catheterisation centres, Italy
290 patients
(aged
mean 58 years,
70%
male)
aortic dissection diagnosed by angiogram, surgery or autopsy (during 1976-1987)
Excluded if
- traumatic or iatrogenic causes
94%
followed for
unclear
Outcomes studied:
- died before surgery
- unfit for surgery
- death by 30 days after surgery
- Data was collected via a questionnaire which was divided into four categories: clinical , angiographic, anaesthetic data and information on patient outcome.
The evidence
| outcome |
time to outcome |
number of patients/total number |
%
(95% CI) |
| died before surgery
|
unclear
|
23/290 |
7.9%
(4.8% to
11%) |
| unfit for surgery
|
unclear
|
39/290 |
13%
(9.5% to
17%) |
| death by 30 days after surgery
|
unclear
|
101/219 |
46%
(40% to
53%) |
- type A: 217 patients (aged 55.1
±
11); type B: 73 patients (aged 61.1
±
8)
- type A/B- classified according to the Stanford type A/B nomenclature based on the presence or absence of involvement of the ascending aorta irrespective of the site of the primary intimal tear and regardless of the extent of distal propagation.
- Survival from surgery improved over the course of the study.
Citation
-
Chirillo
F,
Marchiori
MC,
Andriolo
L, et al:
Outcome of 290 patients with aortic dissection. A 12-year multicentre experience.
European Heart Journal
1990;
11:
311-319
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
December 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
aortic dissection |
| Intervention or Exposure |
prevalence |
| Outcome |
death |
|
|