Burn: prophylactic penicillin did not clearly prevent cellulitis.
|
|
The study
Double-blinded concealed randomised
trial
without
intention-to-treat
Setting: burn and trauma centre, university hospital, USA
98 patients
(aged
range 18 to 77 years; mean 34,
86%
male)
with burns covering 1% to 91% of their body surface area (mean 20%)
Excluded if
- electrical burns
- burns > 48 hours
- allergy to penicillin
- antibiotics within 30 days prior
- established infection
- treated with biologic dressing
- diabetes mellitus, steroids/immunosuppressants, massive obesity, severe malnutrition, malignancy
Control Group: (n = ., 26 analysed):
placebo
Experimental Group: (n = , 25 analysed):
penicillin V potassium
250 mg every 6 hours for 5 days or benzylpenicillin 1.2 million units IV every 12 hours for 5 days
52% followed for
18
days
Outcome notes:
-
cellulitis
: area of warm, spreading cutaneous erythema accompanied by local pain and fever. Early if during prophylactic administration, otherwise late.
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| cellulitis
|
18
days |
7 (26.9%) |
11 (44.0%) |
-63% (-254% to
25%) |
-17.1% (-43.0% to
8.79%) |
-6
(NNT = 11 to infinity;
NNH =
2
to infinity)
|
| systemic sepsis
|
18
days |
3 (11.5%) |
2 (8.00%) |
31% (-281% to
87%) |
3.54% (-12.7% to
19.8%) |
28
(NNT = 5 to infinity;
NNH =
8
to infinity)
|
Comments
- Small sample size and poor follow-up make these results less reliable.
Citation
-
Durtschi
MB,
Orgain
C,
Counts
GW, et al:
A prospective study of prophylactic penicillin in acutely burned hospitalized patients.
Journal of Trauma
1982;
22 (1):
11-14
Search Terms:
cellulitis therapy
Contributor: John Epling and Chris Ball,
November 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
burns |
| Intervention or Exposure |
penicillin |
| Comparison |
placebo |
| Outcome |
cellulitis |
|
|