Cellulitis: no clear difference between ofloxacin and cephalexin.
|
|
The study
Unblinded ?concealed randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: emergency department, university hospital, USA
72 patients
(aged
range 18 to 57 years,
50%
male)
mild to moderate skin or soft-tissue infections (63% with abscess, 19% cellulitis, 15% with wound infection, and impetigo in 3%)
Excluded if
- <18 years old
- pregnant
- severe liver or renal dysfunction
- clinical evidence of serious infection necessitating hospitalisation or parenteral therapy
Control Group: (n = 34, 34 analysed):
cephalexin
500 mg po bid (phase I - 46 patients); cephalexin 500 mg po qid (phase II - 26 patients)
Experimental Group: (n = 38, 38 analysed):
ofloxacin
300 mg po bid (phase I - 46 patients); ofloxacin 400 mg po bid (phase II - 26 patients)
100% followed for
2
days
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| persistence of cellulitis
|
2
days |
1 (2.94%) |
0 (0.00%) |
100% (% to
%) |
2.94% (-2.74% to
8.62%) |
34
(NNT = 12 to infinity;
NNH =
37
to infinity)
|
- Culture results - S. aureus (43%), no pathogen (37%), streptococci (7%), enterobacteriaceae (7%), Strep. species (4%), enterococci (2%).
- Costs described in study - ofloxacin US $50 to 95, cephalexin $20 to $37 .
Comments
- Two phases to study - note the change in dosage.
Citation
-
Powers
RD,
:
Soft tissue infections in the emergency department: the case for the use of 'simple' antibiotics.
Southern Medical Journal
1991;
84 (11):
1313-1315
Search Terms:
cellulitis and therapy
Contributor: John Epling and Chris Ball,
November 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
skin and soft tissue infections |
| Intervention or Exposure |
ofloxacin |
| Comparison |
cephalexin |
| Outcome |
persistence of cellulitis |
|
|