Pulmonary embolism: no clear benefit from streptokinase.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b-)
-
Patients with pulmonary embolism who received streptokinase rather than heparin were not clearly less likely to die.
|
|
Ly et al:
Acta Medica Scandinavia
1978;
203:
465-470
|
Expires
October 2003
|
The study
?blinded ?concealed randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: university hospital, Denmark
20 patients
(aged
range 23 to 70 years; mean 54,
?%
male)
pulmonary embolism confirmed by pulmonary angiogram within 14 days of onset
Excluded if
symptoms for five days or more
minor embolism affecting less than one lobar artery
known or recent bleeding from urogenital tract
major surgery within ten days
recent cerebrovascular episodes
severe hypertension (diastolic pressure 120 mmHg or more, or hypertensive retinopathy grade 3-4)
severe renal or hepatic insufficiency
pregnancy or recent delivery
known malignant disease
aged >70
Control Group: (n = 10, 10 analysed):
heparin
for 72 hours
Experimental Group: (n = 10, 10 analysed):
streptokinase
for 72 hours
All patients received warfarin. Pulmonary angiogram was repeated at 72 hours.
100% followed for
4
weeks
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| death
|
4
weeks |
2 (20.0%) |
1 (10.0%) |
50% (-367% to
95%) |
10.0% (-21.0% to
41.0%) |
10
(NNT = 2 to infinity;
NNH =
5
to infinity)
|
No difference in major bleeds were noted.
Comments
- The study is too small to demonstrate small benefits of one dosing method over the other. It is unclear how angiographic changes relate to patient outcomes.
Citation
-
Ly
B,
Arnesen
H,
Eie
H, et al:
A controlled clinical trial of streptokinase and heparin in the treatment of major pulmonary embolism.
Acta Medica Scandinavia
1978;
203:
465-470
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
October 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
pulmonary embolism |
| Intervention or Exposure |
streptokinase |
| Comparison |
heparin |
| Outcome |
death |
|
|