Carbon monoxide poisoning: normobaric oxygen was more effective and safer than hyperbaric oxygen.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients with carbon monoxide poisoning who received normobaric 100% oxygen compared with hyperbaric 100% oxygen were less likely to have continued mental retardation requiring further treatment after three sessions
(NNT =
8
at
unknown)
.
-
Patients given normobaric oxygen had fewer abnormal neuropsychological tests at the end of treatment.
-
Patients given normobaric oxygen were less likely to have delayed neurological sequelae
(NNT =
21
at 30
days)
and were not clearly more likely to die than patients given hyperbaric oxygen.
-
Patients given normobaric oxygen were less likely to suffer from complications
(NNT =
13
at 3
days)
.
|
|
Scheinkestel et al:
Medical Journal of Australia
1999;
170:
203-210
|
Expires
July 2003
|
The study
Double-blinded concealed randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: hyperbaric chamber, university hospital, Australia
191 patients
(aged
mean 36 years,
81%
male)
with any grade of carbon monoxide poisoning (mean CO level 23&; 73% severe) referred hyperbaric oxygen
Excluded if
- pregnant
- children
- burns victim
Note: - Patients were stratified for type of poisoning (suicide/ accidental) and ventilation (mechanically- ventilated/non-ventilated) before randomisation.
Control Group: (n = 87, 87 analysed):
100% oxygen at 1.0 atmosphere by hood, occlusive face mask or mechanical ventilator for 100 minutes daily for three days. The chamber was flushed with air regularly to simulate pressurisation
Experimental Group: (n = 104, 104 analysed):
100% oxygen by hood, occlusive face mask or mechanical ventilation for 100 minutes daily for 3 days, at 2.8 atmospheres for 60 minutes
All patients had 14 l/min continuous oxygen by face mask or 100% oxygen by endotracheal tube between treatments.
100% followed for
3
days
Outcome notes:
-
delayed neurological sequelae
: morbidity found on follow-up not obvious on discharge, or worsening of test scores by >SD
-
chamber-related complications
: ear barotrauma, oxygen toxicity, severe claustrophobia
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| more than three further treatments required
|
3
days |
13 (15.0%) |
29 (27.9%) |
-87% (-236% to
-4%) |
-12.9% (-24.4% to
-1.52%) |
-8
(-66 to
-4)
|
| death
|
unknown |
3 (3.45%) |
3 (2.88%) |
16% (-304% to
83%) |
0.56% (-4.44% to
5.57%) |
180
(NNT = 18 to infinity;
NNH =
23
to infinity)
|
| delayed neurological sequelae
|
30
days |
0 (0.00%) |
5 (4.81%) |
100% (% to
%) |
-4.81% (-8.92% to
-0.70%) |
-21
(-140 to
-11)
|
| chamber-related complications
|
3
days |
1 (1.15%) |
8 (8.65%) |
-653% (-5727% to
3%) |
-7.50% (-13.4% to
-1.65%) |
-13
(-60 to
-7)
|
| Outcome |
Control Group (SD) |
Experimental Group (SD) |
Mean Difference (95% CI) |
| number of abnormal neuropsychological tests
|
2.7
()
|
3.4
()
|
-0.7
(-1.3 to -0.1)
|
- Clinical features (95% CI):
- suicide attempt- 69% (62% to 75%)
- coma- 53% (46% to 61%)
- acidosis- 13% (8.3% to 18%)
- focal neurological deficits- 7.9% (4.0% to 11.2%)
- EEG changes- 8.4% (4.4% to 12.3%)
- hypotension- 2.6% (0.4% to 4.9%)
- arrhythmias- 4.7% (1.7% to 7.7%)
- pulmonary oedema- 1.6% ( 0.0% to 3.3%)
- convulsions- 2.1% (0.0% to 4.1%)
- cardiac arrest- 1.0% (0.0% to 2.5%)
- headache- 49% (42% to 56%)
- fatigue- 45% (38% to 52%)
- difficulty in thinking- 44% (36% to 51%)
- dizziness- 31% (24% to 37%)
- nausea- 33% (26% to 40%)
- acute confusional state- 16% (11% to 21%)
- paraesthesia- 8.9% (4.9% to 13%)
- visual disturbance- 6.8% (3.2% to 10%)
- palpitations- 5.8% (2.5% to 9.1%)
- chest pain- 5.2% (2.1% to 8.4%)
- tinnitus- 3.1% (0.7% to 5.6%)
- diarrhoea- 2.1% (0.1% to 4.1%)
- 18% of cases were ventilated.
- Severe CO poisoning was defined as mini-mental score 24 or less, COHb level >30%, confusion, focal neurological deficits, loss of consciousness, ECG abnormalities, arrhythmias, pulmonary oedema, metabolic acidosis, hypotension, convulsions and cardiac arrest.
Comments
- The present trial adds significant knowledge to the medical literature not because of evidence of lacking efficacy of
hyperbaric oxygen, but rather because of the proven potential harm compared to standard oxygen application.
Citation
-
Scheinkestel
CD,
Bailey
M,
Myles
PS, et al:
Hyperbaric or normobaric oxygen for acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Medical Journal of Australia
1999;
170:
203-210
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
July 2000
Reviewer: Dirk Stengel
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
CO poisoning |
| Intervention or Exposure |
hyperbaric oxygen |
| Comparison |
normobaric oxygen |
| Outcome |
continued mental retardation, neurological sequale, side effects |
|
|