Upper GI bleed: bleeding duodenal ulcer: gastrectomy prevented rebleeding and reoperation better than oversewing and vagotomy
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 2b)
-
Patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers who had a gastrectomy compared with oversewing and a vagotomy were less likely to rebleed
(NNT =
7
at 4
weeks)
or require further surgery
(NNT =
8
at 4
weeks)
.
-
Patients who have a gastrectomy were more likely to have a duodenal leak
(NNH =
10
at 4
weeks)
.
-
There was no clear effect on mortality
|
|
Millat et al:
World Journal of Surgery
1993;
17 (5):
568-574
|
Expires October 2002
|
The study
Unblinded ?concealed quasi-randomised
trial
without
intention-to-treat
Setting: 22 acute hospitals, France
120 patients
(aged
18 to 85; mean 61,
65%
male)
with an upper GI bleed from a bulbar duodenal ulcer seen on endoscopy, and massive haemorrhage (presence of clinical shock on admission requiring permanent high-rate transfusion to stabilise blood pressure); persistent haemorrhage (requiring >6 units in 4 days); or recurrent haemorrhage (within first week causing a fall of >40 mmHg or haematocrit <30%)
Excluded if
- poor operative risk
- aged <18
- previously undergone surgical treatment for gastroduodenal disease
- no endoscopic signs of active or recent bleeding
- gastric or postbulbar duodenal ulcers
- acute gastroduodenal ulcerations
Note: - Patients were stratified for age, sex and presence of liver cirrhosis before randomisation.
Control Group: (n = 59, 58 analysed):
gastric resection of the distal two-thirds of the stomach with complete excision of the anterior ulcer and the margins of the posterior ulcer +/- truncal vagotomy with antrectomy
Experimental Group: (n = 61, 60 analysed):
oversewing of ulcer plus truncal vagotomy and drainage
Patients were operated on by senior residents or staff surgeons.
98% followed for
4
weeks
Outcome notes:
-
rebleeding
: diagnosed by endoscopy or reoperation and requiring at least 1 unit of blood
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| rebleeding
|
4
weeks |
10 (17.2%) |
2 (3.33%) |
81% (16% to
96%) |
13.91% (3.18% to
24.64%) |
7
(4 to
31)
|
| duodenal leaks
|
4
weeks |
2 (3.45%) |
8 (13.3%) |
-287% (-1645% to
14%) |
-9.89% (-19.68% to
-0.09%) |
-10
(-1174 to
-5)
|
| post-operative mortality
|
4
weeks |
13 (22.4%) |
14 (23.3%) |
-4% (-102% to
46%) |
-0.92% (-16.08% to
14.24%) |
-109
(NNT =
6
to infinity;
NNH = 7 to infinity)
|
| reoperations
|
4
weeks |
8 (13.8%) |
1 (1.67%) |
88% (6% to
98%) |
12.13% (2.68% to
21.57%) |
8
(5 to
37)
|
Citation
-
Millat
B,
Hay
J-M,
Valleur
P, et al:
Emergency surgical treatment for bleeding duodenal ulcer: oversewing plus vagotomy versus gastric resection, a controlled randomized trial.
World Journal of Surgery
1993;
17 (5):
568-574
Contributor: Chris Ball and Musab Hayatli, October 1999
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
bleeding duodenal ulcer |
| Intervention or Exposure |
oversewing and vagotomy |
| Comparison |
gastrectomy |
| Outcome |
rebleeding, reoperation, death |
|
|