Heart failure: clinical examination can help diagnose left-sided heart failure in adults.

Clinical bottom line (level 1a)

  1. Depending on the type of heart failure and its cause, a specific number of clinical signs can categorise patients into high or low risk categories (see large table and flow-diagrams).
Badgett et al: Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 277 (21): 1712-1719
Expires July 2003

The study

Systematic review of all studies of
  • Patients: suspected heart failure
  • Intervention: clinical examination
  • Outcome: diagnosis


Articles found in English using MEDLINE, 1986-1995 (search terms: not detailed; available on request ) and searching bibliographic references and using authors' own file.

Selection criteria: as above
Appraisal criteria: selected and appraised by two independent reviewers
Articles excluded if:

34 studies were found on patients with:
  • a raised filling pressure (12)
  • systolic dysfunction (11)
  • diastolic dysfunction (11)

  • Reference standard: echocardiogram assessing left ventricular end diastolic pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, ejection fraction, fractional shortening
  • Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed on data. Results were classified into:
    • very helpful findings- identified in two or more analyses and all positive
    • somewhat helpful- identified as positive in 50% of studies that included it
    • helpful when present- when identified specificity >90% (SpPin)

The evidence


diagnostic test number of patients sensitivity for
heart failure
(95% CI)
specificity for
heart failure
(95% CI)
LR+ LR-
raised systolic pressure: elective referral %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
3.5 0.6
raised systolic pressure: post-infarct %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
5.7 0.2
raised systolic pressure: summary %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
2.6 0.5
decreased ejection fraction: elective cases: radiographic cardiomegaly %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
2.4 0.62
decreased ejection fraction: elective: Q waves %
(% to %)
90%
(% to %)
decreased ejection fraction: elective: left bundle branch block %
(% to %)
90%
(% to %)
decreased ejection fraction: overall for elective cases %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
2.4 0.1
decreased ejection fraction: post-infarct patients: raised JVP %
(% to %)
high%
(% to %)
decreased ejection fraction: post-infarct: oedema %
(% to %)
high%
(% to %)
decreased ejection fraction: overall for post-infarct %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
2.7 0.3
decreased ejection fraction: all patients %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
2.5 0.2
diastolic dysfunction: current hypertension %
(% to %)
%
(% to %)
1.6-2.0 0.49-0.61
diastolic dysfunction: normal heart size 25-49%
(% to %)
high%
(% to %)
total

  • findings very helpful: increased filling pressure:
    • radiographic distribution
    • raised JVP
    ejection fraction <40%:
    • radiographic cardiomegaly or redistribution
    • anterior q waves
    • left bundle branch block
    • abnormal apical impulse
    diastolic dysfunction:
    • current hypertension (systolic >160, diastolic >100)
  • findings somewhat helpful: increased filling pressure:
    • dyspnoea
    • orthopnoea
    • tachycardia
    • decrease systolic blood pressure
    • proportional pulse pressure <25%
    • third heart sound
    • abnormal abdominojugular reflex
    • radiographic cardiomegaly
    ejection fraction <40%:
    • pulse >90
    • systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
    • proportional pulse pressure <33%
    • third heart sound
    • crackles
    • dyspnoea
    • prior MI
    • CK >200 in post-infarct patient
    diastolic dysfunction:
    • obesity
    • no tachycardia
    • elderly
    • non-smoker
    • no coronary artery disease
  • findings helpful when positive: increased filling pressure:
    • oedema
    ejection fraction <40%:
    • raised JVP
    • oedema
    diastolic dysfunction:
    • normal radiographic heart size
  • Notes on above:
    • radiographic cardiomegaly for ejection fraction and current hypertension for diastolic dysfunction are independent variables
    • proportional pulse pressure (systolic- diastolic/systolic)
    • apical impulse: sustained impulse important- detect using simultaneous auscultation and palpation; impulse must be at least two thirds of systole to be called sustained. Use a tongue blade pressed over apex to produce a visual demonstration of the impulse (or S3). Any increase in size can be detected by percussion.
    • pulmonary vessels redistribution- upper lobe vessels larger than lower (at position equidistant above and below hilum)
  • K interobserver:
    • overall: 0.28-0.37
    • JVP: 0.31-0.69
    • displaced apex beat: 0.53-0.73
    • cardiomegaly: 0.48
    • S3: 0.14-0.60
    • rales: 0.12-0.65
    • oedema: 0.27-0.64
    • interstitial oedema: 0.56-0.83
    • redistribution: 0.38-0.50
  • raised systolic filling pressure:
    • known severe diastolic function?- no (20%); yes (75%)
    • no with 1 or less finding (<10%); no with 2 findings (~70%); no with 3 or more findings (>90%)
    • yes with 0 findings (<10%); yes with 1 or more finding (>90%)
  • Not useful in diagnosis:
    • decreased ejection fraction- age, orthopnoea, LVH on ECG, history of HT, history of CCF
    • diastolic dysfunction- LVF on ECG, history of hypertension, sex, presence of third or fourth heart sound

Comments

  1. There is usually not enough evidence to diagnose diastolic dysfunction- all patients with a raised filling pressure need objective ejection fraction assessment. Differential diagnosis, valvular heart disease, right ventricular dysfunction from emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, intermittent LV ischaemia, iatrogenic volume overload.
  2. Chest x-ray: radiographic cardiomegaly correlates with total LV size (remember other causes, eg. hypertrophy!). False positives include:
    • apical fat pad
    • transverse position of heart
    • decrease in thoracic width
    • AP film, poor inspiration
  3. In general, isolated findings are not good enough to make a diagnosis.
  4. The diagnosis of heart failure improves as clinicians become more experienced.

Citation

  1. Badgett RG, Lucey CR, Mulrow CD: Can the clinical examination diagnose left-sided heart failure in adults?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 277 (21): 1712-1719
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton, July 2000
Reviewer: Edward Havranek

Clinical Question.
    Patient heart failure
    Intervention or Exposure clinical signs
    Outcome diagnosis