Heart failure: clinical examination can help diagnose left-sided heart failure in adults.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1a)
-
Depending on the type of heart failure and its cause, a specific number of clinical signs can categorise patients into high or low risk categories (see large table and flow-diagrams).
|
|
Badgett et al:
Journal of the American Medical Association
1997;
277 (21):
1712-1719
|
Expires
July 2003
|
The study
Systematic review of all studies
of
- Patients: suspected heart failure
- Intervention: clinical examination
- Outcome: diagnosis
Articles found in English
using MEDLINE, 1986-1995
(search terms: not detailed; available on request
)
and searching bibliographic references and using authors' own file.
Selection criteria: as above
Appraisal criteria: selected and appraised by two independent reviewers
Articles excluded if:
34 studies were found on patients with:
- a raised filling pressure (12)
- systolic dysfunction (11)
- diastolic dysfunction (11)
- Reference standard: echocardiogram assessing left ventricular end diastolic pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, ejection fraction, fractional shortening
- Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed on data. Results were classified into:
- very helpful findings- identified in two or more analyses and all positive
- somewhat helpful- identified as positive in 50% of studies that included it
- helpful when present- when identified specificity >90% (SpPin)
The evidence
| diagnostic test |
number of patients |
sensitivity for heart failure
(95% CI) |
specificity for heart failure
(95% CI) |
LR+ |
LR- |
| raised systolic pressure: elective referral |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
3.5
|
0.6
|
| raised systolic pressure: post-infarct |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
5.7
|
0.2
|
| raised systolic pressure: summary |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
2.6
|
0.5
|
| decreased ejection fraction: elective cases: radiographic cardiomegaly |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
2.4
|
0.62
|
| decreased ejection fraction: elective: Q waves |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
90%
(% to
%)
|
|
|
| decreased ejection fraction: elective: left bundle branch block |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
90%
(% to
%)
|
|
|
| decreased ejection fraction: overall for elective cases |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
2.4
|
0.1
|
| decreased ejection fraction: post-infarct patients: raised JVP |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
high%
(% to
%)
|
|
|
| decreased ejection fraction: post-infarct: oedema |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
high%
(% to
%)
|
|
|
| decreased ejection fraction: overall for post-infarct |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
2.7
|
0.3
|
| decreased ejection fraction: all patients |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
2.5
|
0.2
|
| diastolic dysfunction: current hypertension |
|
%
(% to
%)
|
%
(% to
%)
|
1.6-2.0
|
0.49-0.61
|
| diastolic dysfunction: normal heart size |
|
25-49%
(% to
%)
|
high%
(% to
%)
|
|
|
| total |
|
- findings very helpful: increased filling pressure:
- radiographic distribution
ejection fraction <40%:
- radiographic cardiomegaly or redistribution
diastolic dysfunction:
- current hypertension (systolic >160, diastolic >100)
- findings somewhat helpful: increased filling pressure:
- decrease systolic blood pressure
- proportional pulse pressure <25%
- abnormal abdominojugular reflex
- radiographic cardiomegaly
ejection fraction <40%:
- systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
- proportional pulse pressure <33%
- CK >200 in post-infarct patient
diastolic dysfunction:
- no coronary artery disease
- findings helpful when positive: increased filling pressure:
ejection fraction <40%:
diastolic dysfunction:
- normal radiographic heart size
- Notes on above:
- radiographic cardiomegaly for ejection fraction and current hypertension for diastolic dysfunction are independent variables
- proportional pulse pressure (systolic- diastolic/systolic)
- apical impulse: sustained impulse important- detect using simultaneous auscultation and palpation; impulse must be at least two thirds of systole to be called sustained. Use a tongue blade pressed over apex to produce a visual demonstration of the impulse (or S3). Any increase in size can be detected by percussion.
- pulmonary vessels redistribution- upper lobe vessels larger than lower (at position equidistant above and below hilum)
- K interobserver:
- displaced apex beat: 0.53-0.73
- interstitial oedema: 0.56-0.83
- redistribution: 0.38-0.50
- raised systolic filling pressure:
- known severe diastolic function?- no (20%); yes (75%)
- no with 1 or less finding (<10%); no with 2 findings (~70%); no with 3 or more findings (>90%)
- yes with 0 findings (<10%); yes with 1 or more finding (>90%)
- Not useful in diagnosis:
- decreased ejection fraction- age, orthopnoea, LVH on ECG, history of HT, history of CCF
- diastolic dysfunction- LVF on ECG, history of hypertension, sex, presence of third or fourth heart sound
Comments
- There is usually not enough evidence to diagnose diastolic dysfunction- all patients with a raised filling pressure need objective ejection fraction assessment. Differential diagnosis, valvular heart disease, right ventricular dysfunction from emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, intermittent LV ischaemia, iatrogenic volume overload.
- Chest x-ray: radiographic cardiomegaly correlates with total LV size (remember other causes, eg. hypertrophy!). False positives include:
- transverse position of heart
- decrease in thoracic width
- AP film, poor inspiration
- In general, isolated findings are not good enough to make a diagnosis.
- The diagnosis of heart failure improves as clinicians become more experienced.
Citation
-
Badgett
RG,
Lucey
CR,
Mulrow
CD:
Can the clinical examination diagnose left-sided heart failure in adults?.
Journal of the American Medical Association
1997;
277 (21):
1712-1719
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
July 2000
Reviewer: Edward Havranek
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
heart failure |
| Intervention or Exposure |
clinical signs |
| Outcome |
diagnosis |
|
|