Hypoxia: not indicated by vital signs.
|
|
The study
Setting: university hospital, USA
16 patients
(aged
?,
?%
male)
adult volunteers- not sedated or anaesthetised, who received low oxygen concentrations (down to 11%)
Independent unblinded
reference standard, applied in
all
patients from a
consecutive inappropriate
spectrum.
Reference standard:
Diagnostic test:
heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, PaCO2
The evidence
- Difference (95% CI) between PaO2 13 kPa and PaO2 5.5 kPa in vital signs:
- heart rate (bpm): control 73 (9): experimental 71 (6): mean difference 2 (-4 to 8)
- systolic blood pressure (mmHg): control 124 (11): experimental 117 (7): mean difference 7 (0.3 to 13)
- diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): control 77 (9): experimental 74 (5): mean difference 6 (0.5 to 12)
- respiratory rate (breaths/min): control 14 (2): experimental 16 (3): mean difference -2 (-5 to 1)
- PaCO
2
(kPa): control 5.2 (0.67): experimental 4.9 (0.39): mean difference 0.3 (0.1 to 0.7)
Comments
- The study used healthy volunteers- it is unclear whether this also applies to sedated or anaesthetised patients.
Citation
-
Thrush
DN,
Downs
JB,
Hodges
M, et al:
Does significant arterial hypoxemia alter vital signs?.
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
1997;
9:
355-357
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
January 1999
Reviewer: Malcolm Daniel
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
adult volunteers |
| Intervention or Exposure |
heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pCO2 |
| Outcome |
diagnosis of hypoxia |
|
|