Asthma: acute exacerbations: steroids prevent relapse.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1a)
-
Patients who are discharged on a short course of steroids from emergency departments following treatment for acute asthma exacerbations are less likely to relapse
(NNT =
4
at 21
days)
or be admitted to hospital
(NNT =
11
at 21
days)
.
-
Patients use less beta-agonists, and do not clearly have more side effects.
-
Intramuscular steroids may be as effective as oral steroids.
|
|
Rowe et al:
The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1998. Oxford: Update
2000;
4:
-
|
Expires November 2002
|
The study
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
of
- Patients: adults or children discharged from an acute care setting (usually emergency department) after assessment and treatment of an acute asthmatic exacerbation
- Intervention: steroids for 3 to 10 days
compared with placebo
- Outcome: relapse rate or pulmonary function tests
Articles found in all
using Cochrane Airways Group, ? dates
(search terms: asthma and wheez* and RCT
)
and bibliographies were also searched, authors and experts contacted for unpublished studies or other relevant articles
Selection criteria: as above
Appraisal criteria: selected and appraised by two independent blinded reviewers using set criteria (detailed in text)
Articles excluded if: not stated
Seven studies were found- two studies used intramuscular corticosteroids, five studies used oral corticosteroids
The studies were not significantly heterogeneous, except for reporting of side effects.
The evidence
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER |
OR (95% CI) |
NNT (95% CI) |
| relapse
|
7
days |
28/171
(16%) |
0.35 (0.18 to
0.69)
|
10
(8 to
23)
|
| relapse
|
21
days |
20/45
(44%) |
0.34 (0.14 to
0.82)
|
4
(3 to
21)
|
| side effects
|
21
days |
15/60
(25%) |
0.94 (0.43 to
2.13)
|
88
(NNT = 8 to infinity;
NNH =
6
to infinity)
|
| admission to hospital
|
21
days |
14/99
(14%) |
0.34 (0.13 to
0.89)
|
11
(8 to
74)
|
| oral vs intramuscular steroids: relapse
|
7-10
days |
2/29
(6.9%) |
0.62 (0.06 to
6.13)
|
40
(NNT = 15 to infinity;
NNH =
4
to infinity)
|
- beta-agonist use/day: weighted mean difference -3.3 (95% CI: -5.6 to -1.0)
- change in pulmonary function test: mean difference 0.045 (95% CI: -0.47 to 0.56)
Comments
- The Cochrane Airways Review Group (ARG) has developed a 'asthma and wheez* RCT' register through a comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL. In addition, hand searching of the top twenty respiratory care journals has been completed and relevant RCTs have been added to the register. This register contains a variety of studies published in foreign languages- trials were not excluded on the basis of language.
- Patients generally required less than 80% predicted PEFR or FEV1 to be eligible for inclusion in the trials.
- Different co-interventions were provided in each study, including theophylline, beta-agonists and anticholinergics.
- Due to the small number of trials included in this meta-analysis and the overall small number of patients upon which these results are based, no firm conclusions regarding subgroups by severity or age can be made.
- There is to be an NHLBI symposium on the question and hope to develop a large RCT.
Citation
-
Rowe
BH,
Spooner
CH,
Ducharme
FM, et al:
The effectiveness of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma: a meta-analytic of their effect on relapse following acute assessment (Cochrane Review).
The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1998. Oxford: Update
2000;
4:
-
Search Terms:
acute asthma in Cochrane
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
June 2000
Reviewer: Gerard Ryan
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
asthma exacerbation |
| Intervention or Exposure |
corticosteroids |
| Comparison |
placebo |
| Outcome |
relapse |
|
|