DVT: prophylaxis: 40 mg enoxaparin od was most effective at preventing DVT during hip replacement.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients who undergo hip replacement and were given 40 mg od or 30 mg bd enoxaparin, were less likely to have a DVT post-op than those given 10 mg od
(NNT =
8
at 7
days)
.
-
There was no clear difference in the risk of a major bleed with a higher dose of enoxaparin.
-
There were no clear differences between 40 mg od and 30 mg bd.
|
|
Spiro et al:
Annals of Internal Medicine
1994;
121 (2):
81-89
|
Expires
May 2003
|
The study
Double-blinded concealed randomised
trial
with
intention-to-treat
Setting: 32 centres, USA
568 patients
(aged
mean 65 years,
63%
male)
undergoing hip replacement
Excluded if
<31 years old
DVT diagnosed on IPG or ultrasound 14 days before surgery
women with child-bearing potential
ipsilateral hip surgery within three months
history of DVT or PE
heparin-associated thrombocytopenia
haemorrhagic disorder
allergy to heparin/protamine or contrast media
surgery to eye or nervous system within three months
acute GI ulceration
uncontrolled hypertension
use of NSAIDs within four days before surgery
Control Group: (n = 161, 161 analysed):
enoxaparin
10 mg sc od
Experimental Group: (n = 199, 199 analysed):
enoxaparin
40 mg sc od
Experimental Group: (n = 208, 208 analysed):
enoxaparin
30 mg sc every 12 hours
100% followed for
7
days
Outcome notes:
-
major bleed
: overt bleed and one of: death or life-threatening event; acute MI/stroke; retroperitoneal or intracranial haemorrhage; transfused two or more units of blood; fall in haemoglobin of two or more g/dl
The evidence
enoxaparin 10 mg versus 40 mg or 30 mg
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| DVT
|
7
days |
40 (25%) |
49 (12%) |
52% (29% to
67%) |
12.8% (5.42% to
20.2%) |
8
(5 to
18)
|
| major bleed
|
7
days |
3 (1.9%) |
18 (4.4%) |
-140% (-700% to
29%) |
-2.56% (-5.45% to
0.33%) |
-39
(NNT = 302 to infinity;
NNH =
18
to infinity)
|
| death
|
7
days |
0 (0%) |
2 (0.49%) |
-inf% (-75% to
- inf%) |
-0.49% (-1.17% to
0.19%) |
-204
(NNT = 530 to infinity;
NNH =
85
to infinity)
|
enoxaparin 40 mg od versus 30 mg bd
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| DVT
|
7
days |
27 (13.6%) |
22 (10.6%) |
22% (-32% to
54%) |
2.99% (-3.34% to
9.32%) |
33
(NNT = 11 to infinity;
NNH =
30
to infinity)
|
| major bleed
|
7
days |
7 (3.5%) |
11 (5.3%) |
-50% (-280% to
41%) |
-1.77% (-5.75% to
2.20%) |
-56
(NNT = 45 to infinity;
NNH =
17
to infinity)
|
| death
|
7
days |
2 (1.0%) |
0 (0%) |
100% (% to
%) |
1.01% (-0.38% to
2.39%) |
100
(NNT = 42 to infinity;
NNH =
263
to infinity)
|
Comments
- As dose increases, DVT risk reduces and bleeding risk increases. 40 mg od seems to be the optimum dose.
Citation
-
Spiro
TE,
Johnson
GJ,
Christie
MJ, et al:
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin to prevent deep venous thrombosis after hip replacement surgery.
Annals of Internal Medicine
1994;
121 (2):
81-89
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
May 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
undergoing hip replacement |
| Intervention or Exposure |
enoxaparin |
| Outcome |
DVT and death |
|
|