Syncope: More people with syncope had symptoms on tilt testing than those without
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 4)
-
In patients who had a syncopal response to head up tilt testing were likely to have experienced previous syncopal attacks
(NNH =
3
at
unknown)
|
|
Oribe et al:
Pace
1997;
20 (1):
874-879
|
Expires
January 2004
|
The study
Case-control study
with
objective
outcomes,
not adjusted
for confounding factors,
not
validated in an independent set of patients.
Setting: referral centre for syncope evaluation, USA
201 patients
(aged
mean 51 years 95% CI 48-55),
57%
female)
unexplained syncope
Excluded if
adrenoreceptor affecting drugs
anticholinergics
fludrocortisone
Cases: 201
patients (57% female, mean age 51):
unexplained syncope
Controls: 102
patients (55% female, mean age 54):
non-syncopal controls
Factors studied:
positive test
Factors summarised:
history of syncope
Outcomes studied:
positive test
defined as hypotension with bradycardia and symptoms
- Patients underwent head-up tilt tests. Subjects were passively tilted to a 60
°
C head-up position in fifteen seconds.
The evidence
Patient expected event rate for positive test:
37%
| risk factor |
positive test present |
positive test absent |
unadjusted OR
(95% CI) |
NNH
(95% CI) |
| history of syncope
|
74 |
127 |
6.3 (2.8 to
14)
|
3 (1 to
9)
|
| no history of syncope
|
6 |
96 |
Comments
- Study demonstrates no clinical difference between those who head-up tilt positive and those who are negative
Citation
-
Oribe
E,
Caro
S,
Perera
R, et al:
Syncope: the diagnostic value of head-up tilt testing.
Pace
1997;
20 (1):
874-879
Contributor: Bob Phillips and Clare Wotton,
February 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
syncope |
| Intervention or Exposure |
head-up tilt testing |
| Outcome |
syncope; |
|
|