Sickle cell disease: hepatobiliary scintigraphy was not very helpful during an abdominal crisis.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 4)
-
In patients with sickle cell disease and acute abdominal pain, hepatobiliary scintigraphy was not very helpful in diagnosing acute cholecystitis.
-
Gallstones were common in patients with sickle cell disease.
|
|
Serafini et al:
Archives of Internal Medicine
1987;
147:
1061-1062
|
Expires
February 2003
|
The study
Setting: acute hospital, USA
28 patients
(aged
range 6 to 33 years,
?%
male)
sickle cell disease and acute abdominal pain who had hepatobiliary scintigraphy
Independent unblinded
reference standard, applied in
all
patients from a
?consecutive inappropriate
spectrum.
Reference standard:
- hepatobiliary scintigraphy- positive if gallbladder is not visualised at 4 hours
Diagnostic test:
clinical signs and symptoms
- 20 patients had an ultrasound scan, and 90% had gallstones on it.
The evidence
| differential diagnosis |
number of patients |
prevalence
(95% CI) |
| positive scintigraphy
|
9 |
32.1%
(14.8% to
49.4%)
|
- There was no significant difference in clinical findings of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin or white blood cell count.
Comments
- 5 out of 11 were patients treated surgically,and only 2 of these had acute cholecystitis- how good a gold standard is this?
Citation
-
Serafini
AN,
Spoliansky
G,
Sfakianakis
GN, et al:
Diagnostic studies in patients with sickle cell anemia and acute abdominal pain.
Archives of Internal Medicine
1987;
147:
1061-1062
Search Terms:
sickle in Cochrane
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
February 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
sickle cell disease |
| Intervention or Exposure |
clinical signs and symptoms |
| Comparison |
hepatobiliary scintigraphy |
| Outcome |
acute cholecystitis |
|
|