Myocardial infarction: a nurse-led smoking cessation program was cost-effective.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
A nurse-led smoking cessation program was a cost-effective way of helping smokers, following a myocardial infarction, to quit.
|
|
Krumholz et al:
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
1993;
22 (6):
1697-1702
|
Expires March 2003
|
The study
cost-effectiveness analysis
Setting: university hospital, USA
Decision analysis constructed using data from a randomised controlled trial comparing nursing-managed smoking cessation program with usual care.
- Viewpoint: National Health Service or HMO
- Benefit assessment: smoking cessation at 1 year
- Resources and costs: nurses' salaries and cost of manuals. The cost of setting up the program and training the nurses, or indirect costs were not included.
- Sensitivity analysis: Costs and effectiveness of the program were varied.
The evidence
| intervention |
cost |
| cost per year of life saved
|
$220
|
Effect of sensitivity analysis: The program remained cost-effective despite wide variations in costs and treatment success.
Comments
- The nursing smoking cessation program involved giving the patient a manual explaining how to identify high risk smoking situations and some counseling, followed by weekly phone-calls for 3 weeks, then monthly phone-calls for 4 months.
- New cessation methods involving nicotine replacement and bupropion therapy show good rates of cessation; could these make such methods even more cost effective?
Citation
-
Krumholz
HM,
Cohen
BJ,
Tsevat
J, et al:
cost-effectiveness of a smoking cessation program after myocardial infarction.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
1993;
22 (6):
1697-1702
Search Terms:
reference from review article
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
February 2000
Reviewer: Timo Strandberg
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
smokers who have had an MI |
| Intervention or Exposure |
nurse-led smoking cessation program |
| Outcome |
cost-effectiveness |
|
|