Peptic ulcer: NSAIDs: 40 mg omeprazole heals ulcers and erosions with the fewest adverse effects.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Patients with peptic ulcers or erosions from regular NSAIDs use were equally likely to have healed after eight weeks if they took omeprazole or misoprostol.
-
Patients who took 20 mg omeprazole compared with misoprostol were less likely to discontinue therapy
(NNT =
14
at 8
weeks)
.
-
Patients who took 40 mg omeprazole compared with misoprostol were less likely to have moderate to severe symptoms of dyspepsia
(NNT =
20
at 8
weeks)
and were less likely to discontinue therapy
(NNT =
16
at 8
weeks)
.
-
Patients who took 40 mg omeprazole compared with 20 mg were less likely to have moderate to severe symptoms of dyspepsia
(NNT =
20
at 8
weeks)
. There was no clear difference in the numbers who stop therapy.
|
|
Hawkey et al:
New England Journal of Medicine
1998;
338:
727-734
|
Expires
January 2003
|
The study
Double-blinded ?concealed randomised
trial
without
intention-to-treat
Setting: 93 hospitals, Europe, Australia and North America
935 patients
(aged
20 to 85; mean 58,
63%
female)
with any condition requiring continuous treatment with oral or rectal NSAIDs (at least 50 mg diclofenac, 100 mg ketoprofen, 500 mg naproxen daily), and gastric or duodenal peptic ulcers or erosions on endoscopy.
Excluded if
- aged <18, or >85
- severe concurrent reflux esophagitis
- clinically important upper GI bleeding
- pyloric stenosis
- history of gastric surgery
- gastrointestinal disorders that might impair absorption of the study drugs
- on steroids at a dose equivalent to > 10 mg prednisolone
Note:
- All patients continued NSAID medication during the study.
Control Group: (n = , 298 analysed):
misoprostol
200 microg qds
Experimental Group: (n = , 308 analysed):
omeprazole
20 mg daily
Experimental Group: (n = , 315 analysed):
omeprazole
40 mg daily
99% followed for
8
weeks
Outcome notes:
-
treatment success
: fewer than 5 gastric or duodenal erosions, no ulcer n endoscopy: and only mild symptoms of dyspepsia omeprazole 20 mg v. misoprostol
-
treatment success
: omeprazole 40 mg v. misoprostol
-
treatment success
: omeprazole 40 mg v. omeprazole 20 mg
The evidence
omeprazole 20 mg v. misoprostol
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| treatment success
|
8
weeks |
212 (71.1%) |
233 (75.7%) |
6% (-3% to
17%) |
4.51% (-2.52% to
11.5%) |
22
(NNT = 9 to infinity;
NNH =
40
to infinity)
|
| moderate to severe symptoms of dypepsia
|
weeks |
33 (11.1%) |
34 (11.0%) |
0% (-57% to
57%) |
0.03% (-4.96% to
5.03%) |
2700
(NNT = 20 to infinity;
NNH =
20
to infinity)
|
| discontinuation of treatment
|
weeks |
51 (17.1%) |
31 (10.1%) |
41% (11% to
61%) |
7.05% (1.61% to
12.5%) |
14
(8 to
62)
|
omeprazole 40 mg v. misoprostol
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| treatment success
|
8
weeks |
212 (71.1%) |
315 (75.2%) |
6% (-4% to
16%) |
4.10% (-2.92% to
11.1%) |
24
(NNT = 9 to infinity;
NNH =
34
to infinity)
|
| moderate to severe symptoms of dyspepsia
|
weeks |
33 (11.1%) |
19 (6.0%) |
46% (6% to
68%) |
5.04% (0.61% to
9.47%) |
20
(11 to
160)
|
| discontinuation of medication
|
weeks |
51 (17.1%) |
34 (10.8%) |
37% (6% to
58%) |
6.32% (0.84% to
11.8%) |
16
(8 to
120)
|
omeprazole 40 mg v. omeprazole 20 mg
| Outcome |
Time to outcome |
CER | EER | RRR (95% CI) | ARR (95% CI) | NNT (95% CI) |
| treatment success
|
8
weeks |
233 (75.7%) |
237 (75.2%) |
-1% (-9% to
9%) |
-0.41% (-7.17% to
6.35%) |
-240
(NNT = 16 to infinity;
NNH =
14
to infinity)
|
| moderate to severe symptoms of dypepsia
|
8
weeks |
34 (11.0%) |
19 (6.03%) |
45% (6% to
68%) |
5.01% (0.63% to
9.38%) |
20
(11 to
160)
|
| discontinuation of treatment
|
8
weeks |
31 (10.1%) |
34 (10.8%) |
-7% (-70% to
32%) |
-0.73% (-5.53% to
4.07%) |
-140
(NNT = 25 to infinity;
NNH =
18
to infinity)
|
Comments
- Misoprostol is significantly cheaper than omeprazole
- Study results may need reviewing as new information concerning COX-2 specific NSAIDs emerge
Citation
-
Hawkey
CJ,
Karrasch
JA,
Szczepanski
L, et al:
omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
New England Journal of Medicine
1998;
338:
727-734
Contributor: Sharon Straus and Chris Ball, October 1999
Reviewer: Ali Taha
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
NSAID use with peptic ulcers or erosions |
| Intervention or Exposure |
omeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg |
| Comparison |
misoprostol |
| Outcome |
healing of ulcers or erosions |
|
|