Myocardial infarction: no social support increases mortality.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1a)
-
Patients who had a first myocardial infarction and had social support are less likely to die than those with no social support.
|
|
Bucher
:
Journal of General Internal Medicine
1994;
9:
409-417
|
Expires March 2003
|
The study
Systematic review of inception cohorts
of
- Patients: first myocardial infarction
- Intervention: social support (family, close confidants etc.)
compared with no social support
- Outcome: cardiac death, sudden death or total mortality
Articles found in ?
using MEDLINE, ?
(search terms: coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, psychosocial factors, social support and social isolation
)
and no other searching strategies were employed.
Selection criteria: as above
Appraisal criteria: no details given
Articles excluded if: no complete report of follow-up, not objective outcomes, inadequate adjustment for confounding factors, inadequate randomisation in intervention studies
Nine cohorts involving 10, 454 patients were included.
- Indicator of social support varied between studies.
The evidence
- Five out of nine of the cohorts showed that no social support increased the risk of death.
- Relative risks for the five cohorts ranged between 1.47 to 5.62.
- The studies showed that the increased risk of death with no social support was increased more for men than women.
- Two intervention studies (RCTs) demonstrate reduced mortality with community interventions (RR~0.5 for sudden death rates)
Comments
- The results of the nine cohorts were not combined to give an overall relative risk.
Citation
-
Bucher
HC,
:
Social support and prognosis following first myocardial infarction.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
1994;
9:
409-417
Contributor: Clare Wotton and Bob Phillips,
February 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
myocardial infarction |
| Intervention or Exposure |
presence of social support |
| Comparison |
absence of social support |
| Outcome |
mortality |
|
|