Gastroenterology: ibuprofen was the safest NSAID.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 3a)
-
Patients who take ibuprofen were least likely to require admission to hospital with serious gastrointestinal complications, compared with other NSAIDs.
|
|
Henry et al:
British Medical Journal
1996;
312:
1563-1566
|
Expires October 2002
|
The study
Systematic review of all controlled epidemiological studies
of
- Patients: in the community
- Intervention: NSAIDs
- Outcome: serious peptic ulcer complications requiring admission to hospital
Articles found in ?English
using MEDline, 1985 to 1994
(search terms: )
and reviewing bibliographies of previously published meta-analyses and reviews. Authors of relevant studies were also contacted.
Selection criteria: by two independent reviewers
Appraisal criteria: ascertainment and validation of study outcomes, selection and comparability of controls, ascertainment of exposure, and control or adjustment for potential confounders.
Articles excluded if: - no data on the use of individual drugs or showing an association with GI damage
12 studies found on 14 NSAIDs. Doses were at least: ibuprofen 1200 mg, naproxen 500 mg, indomethicin 75 mg daily.
- Drugs were compared against ibuprofen.
No significant heterogeneity was noted.
The evidence
risk factor for
serious gastrointestinal complications
|
adjusted
OR (95% CI) |
| ibuprofen
|
1.0 (- to
-)
|
| fenoprofen
|
1.6 (1.0 to
2.5)
|
| aspirin
|
1.6 (1.3 to
2.0)
|
| diclofenac
|
1.8 (1.4 to
2.3)
|
| sulindac
|
2.1 (1.6 to
2.7)
|
| diflunisal
|
2.2 (1.2 to
4.1)
|
| naproxen
|
2.2 (1.7 to
2.9)
|
| indomethacin
|
2.4 (1.9 to
3.1)
|
| tolmetin
|
3.0 (1.8 to
4.9)
|
| piroxicam
|
3.8 (2.7 to
5.2)
|
| ketoprofen
|
4.2 (2.7 to
6.4)
|
| azapropazone
|
9.2 (4.0 to
21.0)
|
Comments
- Dose of ibuprofen was low (1200mg/day) and benefits may not persist when higher doses are used.
- No PEER was given, so numbers-needed-to-harm could not be calculated.
Citation
-
Henry
D,
Lim
L,
Rodriguez
LA, et al:
variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a collaborative meta-analysis.
British Medical Journal
1996;
312:
1563-1566
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton, October 1999
Reviewer: Daniel Sontheimer
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
in the community |
| Intervention or Exposure |
NSAIDs |
| Outcome |
gastrointestinal complications |
|
|