Coronary artery disease: hypercholesterolaemia: simvastatin therapy is cost-effective
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
Simvastatin therapy for patients with angina or a myocardial infarction and elevated cholesterol levels is cost-effective.
|
|
Johannesson et al:
New England Journal of Medicine
1997;
336 (5):
332-336
|
Expires March 2003
|
The study
cost-effectiveness analysis
Setting: acute hospitals, Sweden
A Markow decision analysis based on data taken from a randomised controlled trial of patients with a history of angina or myocardial infarction and cholesterol levels 5.5 to 8.0 mmol/l who received simvastatin or placebo.
- Viewpoint: National Health Service or HMO
- Benefit assessment: reduction in morbidity and mortality
- Resources and costs: Costs included indirect costs and were taken from the cost-accounting systems of four Swedish hospitals; costs and numbers of years of life gained were discounted by 5%
- Sensitivity analysis: Costs, treatment effectivness and quality of life were varied.
The evidence
| intervention |
cost |
| cost for men per year gained
|
US (1995) $1600
|
| cost for women per year gain
|
US (1995) $5100
|
Effect of sensitivity analysis: Costs for men ranged from savings to $9300 per year saved and for women from $100 to $18 500 per year saved.
Citation
-
Johannesson
M,
Jonsson
B,
Kjekshus
J, et al:
cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease.
New England Journal of Medicine
1997;
336 (5):
332-336
Search Terms:
?
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
February 2000
Reviewer: Dwight Peretz
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
angina or MI and elevated cholesterol |
| Intervention or Exposure |
simvastatin |
| Outcome |
cost-effectiveness |
|
|