Giant cell arteritis: no inherent effect on death rate.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 4)
-
Patients with giant cell arteritis did not have a higher mortality.
-
Visual symptoms were common and did not improve.
|
|
Huston et al:
Annals of Internal Medicine
1978;
88:
162-167
|
Expires
February 2001
|
The study
Retrospective cohort study
with
objective
outcomes,
not adjusted
for confounding factors,
not
validated in an independent set of patients.
Setting: US county
42 patients
(aged
range 56 to 92 years; median 75,
80%
female)
positive temporal artery biopsies
All patients received steroids immediately.
Outcomes studied:
The evidence
- Prevalence at January 1975 was 1.33 per 1000 in patients older than 50 years.
- Giant cell arteritis had no effect on overall survival.
- 40% of patients had visual symptoms- 10% with permanent vision loss. No patient's sight improved.
Comments
- Small number of patients, spread over a long period of time. Difficult to make any useful comments.
Citation
-
Huston
KA,
Hunder
GG,
Lie
JT, et al:
Temporal arteritis: a twenty-five year epidemiological, clinical and pathologic study.
Annals of Internal Medicine
1978;
88:
162-167
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
February 2000
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
giant cell arteritis |
| Intervention or Exposure |
in US county |
| Outcome |
prevalence |
|
|