Upper GI bleeds: cost effectiveness of H. pylori eradication regimens
varied.
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 1b)
-
In patients with duodenal ulcer disease, treating with
omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole (OCM) plus C-urea breath test plus
OCM if required was more expensive than OCM alone or omeprazole, amoxycillin
and metronidazole plus breath test plus OCM if required, but was better at
eradicating H. pylori.
-
Strategies involving multiple breath tests were more expensive
and no more effective at eradication.
-
Using OCM alone was half the cost of using OCM plus breath test
plus OCM and only 6% less effective.
|
|
Duggan et al:
British Medical Journal
1998;
316:
1648-1654
|
Expires
January 2003
|
The study
Decision analysis model
Setting: UK
Two decision analysis models comparing the cost
effectiveness of two H. pylori eradication regimens with or without a
subsequent confirmatory C-urea breath test, and a second course for patients in
whom eradication was unsuccessful.
- Viewpoint: prescriber
- Benefit assessment: cumulative direct treatment costs
- Resources and costs: Cost assessment involved the cost of omeprazole,
clarithromycin and metronidazole (29.20GBP) and the omeprazole, amoxycillin and
metronidazole (20.20GBP) regimens, cost of the C-urea breath test (30.80GBP)
and the annual cost of maintenanace and relapse treatment of duodenal ulcer
disease with ranitidine (55.60GBP). Unit costs were based on the cost of NHS
drug treatments from the 1996 British National Formulary, and the cost of the
C-urea breath test from the Bureau of Stable Isotope
Analysis.
- Sensitivity analysis: Varying efficacy and cost
estimates.
The evidence
| intervention |
cost |
| omeprazole, amoxycillin and metronidazole
(OAM)
|
23.76GP for successsful eradication
( 85% eradication
)
|
| omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole
(OCM)
|
32.08GBP for successful eradication
( 91% eradication
)
|
| OAM+C-urea breath test+OCM
|
58.63GBP for successful eradication
( 94% eradication
)
|
| OCM + breath test + OCM
|
64.78GBP for successful eradication
( 97% eradication
)
|
| OAM + breath test
|
59.62GBP for successful eradication
( 85% eradication
)
|
| OCM + breath test
|
66.34GBP for successful eradication
( 91% eradication
)
|
| OAM + breath test + OCM + breath
test
|
63.25GBP for successful eradication
( 94% eradication
)
|
| OCM + breath test + OCM + breath
test
|
68.06GBP for successful eradication
( 97% eradication
)
|
Effect of sensitivity analysis: The sensitivity analysis had little effect on the
outcome.
Comments
- Empiric treatment may be warranted in standard risk
patients.
- Those with complicated disease (esp. bleeding ulcers) will
probaly benefit from retesting as the risks of H.Pylori are
increased.
Citation
-
Duggan
AE,
Tolley
K,
Hawkey
CJ, et al:
Varying efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication
regimens: cost effectiveness study using a decision analysis
model.
British Medical Journal
1998;
316:
1648-1654
Contributor: Clare Wotton and Musab Hayatli,
January 2000
Reviewer: Santiago Alvarez Montero
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
duodenal ulcer disease |
| Intervention or Exposure |
H. pylori eradication strategies |
| Outcome |
cost-effectiveness |
|
|