Atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter: bradyarrhythmias were common on starting antiarrhythmic medication
|
|
|
Clinical bottom line (level 4)
-
One in seven patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter starting anti-arrhythmic medication had a cardiac adverse event - half with bradyarrhythmias.
-
Symptomatic bradyarrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmias were rare. Very few patients suffered cardiac emboli.
-
Patients with a previous myocardial infarction were more likely to suffer an adverse effect.
|
|
Maisel et al:
Annals of Internal Medicine
1997;
127 (4):
281-284
|
Expires
December 2003
|
The study
Case series
with
?objective ?blinded
outcomes,
adjusted
for confounding factors,
not
validated in an independent set of patients.
Setting: university hospital, USA
417 patients
(aged
mean 64,
59%
male)
with atrial fibrillation or flutter (confirmed on ECG - duration for a mean of 12 months) underwent initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for conversion to sinus rhythm or maintenance of sinus rhythm following cardioversion. Patients underwent a total of 597 drug trials during a total of 550 hospitalisations.
Excluded if
aged < 18
acute illness, such as acute myocardial infarction
cardiac surgery within 30 days of admission
previous heart transplantation
amiodarone treatment within 1 year of admission
Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors.
?100%
followed for
3 days
Outcomes studied:
cardiac adverse event
ventricular arrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, prolonged QT interval, conduction abnormalities, congestive heart failure, rapid ventricular rate, or hypotension requiring medical intervention, or discontinuation or reduction in dose of medicine; or a cerebrovascular event
bradyarrhythmia
symptomatic bradyarrhythmia
ventricular arrhythmia
torsade de pointes
cerebrovascular emboli
confirmed on CT scan
any adverse effect
The evidence
| outcome |
time to outcome |
number of patients/total number |
%
(95% CI) |
NNF
(95% CI) |
| cardiac adverse event
|
3
days
|
80/597 |
13%
(11% to
16%) |
7 (6 to
9)
|
| bradyarrhythmia
|
3 days
|
47/597 |
7.9%
(5.7% to
10%) |
13 (10 to
18)
|
| symptomatic bradyarrhythmia
|
3
days
|
25/597 |
4.2%
(% to
%) |
24 (17 to
39)
|
| ventricular arrhythmia
|
3 days
|
8/597 |
1.3%
(0.4% to
2.3%) |
75 (44 to
240)
|
| torsade de pointes
|
3 days
|
1/597 |
0.2%
(0.0% to
0.5%) |
600 (200 to
infinity)
|
| cerebrovascular emboli
|
3 days
|
2/597 |
0.3%
(0.0% to
0.8%) |
300 (130 to
infinity)
|
| any adverse effect
|
3
days
|
163/597 |
27.3%
(% to
%) |
4 (3 to
4)
|
prognostic factor for
any adverse effect
|
time to outcome |
control rate (%) |
adjusted
OR (95% CI) |
| patient had previous myocardial infarction
|
? |
|
1.90 (1.05 to
3.43)
|
Citation
-
Maisel
WH,
Kuntz
KM,
Reimold
SC, et al:
Risk of initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to a university hospital.
Annals of Internal Medicine
1997;
127 (4):
281-284
Contributor: Chris Ball and Clare Wotton,
December 1999
Reviewer:
Clinical Question.
| Patient |
atrial fibrillation |
| Intervention or Exposure |
anti-arrhythmic medication |
| Outcome |
adverse effects |
|
|